Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miner of Duty

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. :) ·Salvidrim!· ✉ 12:35, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Miner of Duty[edit]

(Find video game sources: "Miner of Duty" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk)

WP:VG/RS hits are all cursory mentions. No significant coverage—only ref is from an unreliable source. Article topic doesn't pass the search engine test for notability (the GNG). Page author removed PROD citing the page's lack of content but no argument for notability. czar · · 21:05, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) czar · · 21:06, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:08, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The game was the fourth most purchased indie video game for Xbox Live, but I found no significant coverage. SL93 (talk) 03:44, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like that link ranks it 13th for the year (instead of fourth) czar · · 03:35, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.