Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minecraft affect
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy deleted. as vandalism by two different administrators Secret account 07:09, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Minecraft affect[edit]
- Minecraft affect (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsourced pseudo-medical condition that appears to be something made up one day. Not verifiable or notable, if it exists at all. Contested prod so brought here for discussion. Sparthorse (talk) 10:47, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Adding the same article about the same subject subsequently created by the same author: Minecraft effect (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Delete Totally unsourced. No evidence of notability. The term "Minecraft effect" seems to have been invented on a web forum, and this Wikipedia article seems to be an attempt to publicise it. (Not to mention that, in the unlikely event that the article is kept, it should be renamed to correct the spelling.) JamesBWatson (talk) 14:25, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Practically content-free. WP:MADEUP. Pburka (talk) 15:28, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No reliable sources, obviously made up and created as an in-joke, unless we're supposed to believe a video game has made people get confused and "punch trees." Rnb (talk) 19:03, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. As above. noisy jinx huh? 19:50, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not to mention the creator cannot tell the difference between "affect" and "effect", in which the latter would be the correct usage. –MuZemike 20:55, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete - G3 as hoax →Στc. 01:42, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete that forum in the external links keeps it from a G3 vandalism unfortunately, though this is a WP:SNOW candidate. Secret account 06:59, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.