Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minebest

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 10:30, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Minebest[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to fail WP:SIGCOV and WP:NCORP. Maybe too soon Josalm64rc (talk) 03:16, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I certainly didn't uncover any reliable sources for either GNG or CORPDEPTH. JamieWhat (talk) 04:11, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good day. I deny breaking WP:CORPDEPTH. But, I reviewed the page and found that I violated PSCOI, namely: the presence of 2 links to openly advertising materials. I will edit them, it will solve your claim? In turn, I ask you to adhere to WP: NEWBIES, namely, specifically write what is better to fix to save the article. I will be happy to discuss all claims. SerhiiHarbaruk (talk) 11:05, 4 August 2019 (+3UTC)

Delete, possibly speedily. Yet another coin-related questionable page. No evidence of GNG.49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 04:59, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good day. Please, I suggest sticking to Wikipedia terminology. You put my article to be deleted and I ask you to specifically indicate the location of the error. I am ready to correct the error, if possible. Thank. Also, for my part, I will indicate that your assumption about the doubtfulness of the article is governed by some criteria? This needs to be discussed. I carefully studied everything. Yes, I just now saw that 2 links are breaking my PSCOI. But I am ready to fix it. I assure you that I have no WP: COI violations. Interest in this article is caused by the preparation for scientific work. My scientific activity studies the field of the cryptocurrency economy, and, in Poland, this is a very significant unit of the cryptocurrency economy. Please report a specific error in this article, I am ready to correct the violations, if any. Regarding WP: GNG: I am ready to add sources of information in Polish language for comparative studies. Will this solve the situation? SerhiiHarbaruk (talk) 11:19, 4 August 2019 (+3UTC)

Delete TOOSOON. Company itself adding COI after deletion notice. Company account spamublocked.. -- Alexf^(talk) 22:47, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:40, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:40, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:40, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:42, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.