Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mina Cvetković

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Only no consensus because there still aren't any reliable sources in the article itself... Sandstein 09:45, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mina Cvetković (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cvetković is not a relevant or notable person. The only reference shown does not show any relevance and does not comply with WP:SIGCOV. Vercelas (quaestiones?) 18:37, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:09, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:09, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:10, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per WP:NEXIST. Cvetković is a world-class model, as can be evidenced from
    • "Instagramming Model Mina Cvetkovic Loves U2, and We Love Her for It". Vogue. July 20, 2015. (fully about her)
    • "Mina Cvetkovic Transforms at Rick Owens". New York Times. March 3, 2016. (photo gallery)
as well as several articles from Serbian press:
No such user (talk) 08:44, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
On the last link, appear only on a cover of a known magazine does not grant immediate relevant. Please note that this reference just names it and this is less than a journalistic note. --Vercelas (quaestiones?) 16:16, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You don't need to know much Serbian to figure out that "Ekskluzivni intervju" means "Exclusive interview". While an interview may not be very useful as a source for facts (except for her own statements and opinions), it certainly helps establish notability and SIGCOV. A respectable magazine does not perform "exclusive interviews" with little-known people.
Actually, she was featured in over a dozen issues of several fashion magazines, see http://www.designscene.net/female-models/mina-cvetkovic for the full list. I'm not into the fashion scene at all, but I the sheer range of sources I found negates your statement that she is "not a relevant or notable person". No such user (talk) 09:18, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
For more prestige possess a publisher, an interview should only be used as a source to support a statement, not to demonstrate relevance. An interview is merely the publication of someone's personal objections. Wikipedia is not a directory or annex of any model or similar. Probably dozens, or hundreds of models, mostly devoid of enciclopedic relevance, have posed in such magazines, such as Elle. --Vercelas (quaestiones?) 23:36, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor 18:42, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dom from Paris (talk) 16:16, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.