Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Min-yr-Awel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --MelanieN (talk) 23:37, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Min-yr-Awel

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I was contacted off-wiki about this article by a friend with local knowledge, they stated that "Min yr awel is a street in a small village called Pontneddfechan". After conducting my own investigations, it seems that there is something at these coordinates called "Min-yr-Awel", but what exactly it is I'm not sure.

Open Street Map doesn't seem to include it at all.
Google Maps labels it ambiguously as perhaps a small area of Pontneddfechan, and notes that the bus stops to the west are both called "Min-yr-Awel" and the one to the east it notes as "Min-yr-Awel turning circle" geograph image on Commons. The only seemingly non-residential building is clearly labelled as "Pontneddfechan village hall". There is no streetview anywhere near.
[1] refers to it unambiguously as a street, but I don't know how reliable that site is.
There is a prominent feature nearby, Dinas Rock, but the only mention of "Min-yr-Awel" in relation to it I can find is the bus stop name.
Google results for the village hall describe it variously as "at Min-yr-Awel, Pontneddfechan" or "in Min-yr-Awel, Pontneddfechan"
I can't find any additional information, other than it has a postbox, that is actually about this settlement (if it is one) that isn't from Wikpiedia's unsourced sub-stub. Thryduulf (talk) 09:48, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 09:50, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - village is noticed in some services, like here. However, by SUBSTUB policy: "If the content is totally redundant and trivial, you may mark it for speedy deletion.". It is very trivial and doesn't provide useful information. It is written not professionally - "very small" doesn't sound good. Tymon.r Do you have any questions? 17:13, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Cannot verify that it's a street, and, if it is a street, it's a more or less trivial route in a very small place. Hithladaeus (talk) 18:12, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.