Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mimi Miyagi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep apparently (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 04:12, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mimi Miyagi[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails POLITICIAN by the same margin she fails PORNBIO & GNG. Hint, its by a country mile. Spartaz ^Humbug! 16:32, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:06, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:06, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:06, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:06, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge any relevant content to Nevada gubernatorial election, 2006 - After doing a fair amount of research on the subject under consideration here, there does not appear to be enough notability to justify a stand-alone article on Ms. Damayo at this time. Guy1890 (talk) 04:09, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - There are enough reliable sources under the general notability guidelines to support an article. Most already in the article. Articles about her run[1][2][3] and also her being one of the first porn girls to turn to webmastering their own site[4][5] (which I believe also satisfies criteria 2 of pornbio) [6][7] Morbidthoughts (talk) 06:15, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Far better known in her earlier career than in her political career and plenty of sources for that. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:10, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:10, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:10, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Note: I have heavily edited the article under consideration here and added many of the references mentioned above. The subject here now appears to pass GNG and/or PORNBIO by having "been featured multiple times in notable mainstream media", namely The Standard, The Village Voice, Complex, the book Image Ethics in the Digital Age, and several times in the Las Vegas Review-Journal. Guy1890 (talk) 06:57, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep While her attempt as a politician was a joke, she has received enough coverage related to her porn career to warrant an article. Wikiuser20102011 (talk) 00:32, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails notability guidelines for pornagraphic actors and for politicians.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:44, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I don't see a satisfactory outcome here. The subject pretty clearly isn't notable as a performer. The limited, but apparently not negligible, coverage she received as a losing-by-a-country-mile candidate would ordinarily support a merge/redirect to the election article. But that article is skeletal, and devoting more space to Myagi than to the candidates with substantial support wouldn't be justified. Therefore, temporizing keep until the election article is appropriately developed. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 03:38, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 01:22, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, very obviously passes GNG, by a country mile. There is no reason for deletion outside the very dedicate POV pushing by the nominator. Cavarrone 07:46, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, It doesn't matter that she "lost by a country mile" or what her motivation or purpose was to run for office. There are many insignificant politicians who have run for office and have articles. Also, the fact that she has done mainstream/non-porn industry work makes her notable. Despite the lack of success. Hobbamock (talk) 13:16, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.