Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Milutin Dostanić bibliography

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:12, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Milutin Dostanić bibliography[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article created by subject's son shortly after Dostanić passed away. Article PRODded with reason "All academics publish and those publications can be found in multiple databases. There's no reason for WP to repeat this, LinkedIn or ResearchGate are more appropriate for that." Article dePRODded with reason "I see no reason for deleting this article and list of this person's academic publications. All actors act in movies, you have databases (like imdb) regarding their filmographies, yet you can still find their separate article filmograhies on Wikipedia." The situation is not the same, however. While virtually all movies will be notable in itself, only very few academic articles in general, and none in this list in particular, are notable in and of itself. This list has previously been deleted from the author's biography by Drmies. WP is not for posting CVs. Hence: delete. Randykitty (talk) 08:46, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

PS I forgot to mention that the article on Milutin Dostanić is also at AfD. --Randykitty (talk) 14:08, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Randykitty (talk) 08:46, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. Randykitty (talk) 08:46, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:09, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Xxanthippe (talk) 11:17, 26 May 2019 (UTC).[reply]
Delete. Dostanić would probably not pass WP:ACADEMIC. In any case WP:NOTBIBLIOGRAPHY, WP:NOTMEMORIAL and WP:NOTDIRECTORY apply here. D.Lazard (talk) 12:02, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Oops, forgot to mention that he's currently also at AfD, see PS above. --Randykitty (talk) 14:08, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete--impressive piece of work, but unfortunately not for here. Drmies (talk) 13:55, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This sort of indiscriminate listing is not what Wikipedia is for. We should only keep curated lists of the most significant publications of an academic, when there are adequate published reliable sources to tell us which ones those are, and in most cases they should be short enough that they can be included directly in the subject's biography article instead of overwhelming it. For a more or less complete listing of any mathematician's publications, in many cases with independent reviews of the publications, go to MathSciNet instead. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:49, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the above. XOR'easter (talk) 21:35, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, issues addressed in comments above, and WP:OVERLAP. Even if Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Milutin Dostanić (2nd nomination) results in "Keep," which looks unlikely, this article is redundant and would be merged. — Satori Son 21:44, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 01:25, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 01:26, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bibliographies-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 01:27, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.