Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miloslav Petrusek

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Per the consensus, subject appears to meet WP:NACADEMIC. (non-admin closure) Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 20:50, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Miloslav Petrusek[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD - Unreferenced biography stub without any indication of notability. Does not meet WP:NACADEMIC Peter Rehse (talk) 16:07, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Gino1984 (talk · contribs) - Added bibliography and additional information to the entry, including references - on notability: according to WP:NACADEMIC this person meets criteria 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6. --Gino1984 (talk) 04:25, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Pro-rector and faculty dean of a very major university if nothing else. You don't get to those positions in a university as prestigious as the Charles University if you're a nobody. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:35, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 16:35, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 16:35, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Not withdrawing (rather see this go to completion)- but I feel a lot better about this then when initially proposed. I would like to see better sources - a bibliography list does not indicate much.Peter Rehse (talk) 16:40, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Excellent GS citations. Xxanthippe (talk) 06:16, 10 June 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Academics publish - its what they do. List of publications do not speak to notability.Peter Rehse (talk) 08:30, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

One might as well say "Nobel prizewinners win Nobel Prizes - its (sic) what they do." Xxanthippe (talk) 09:09, 10 June 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Citations do, though... --Gino1984 (talk) 09:00, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes indeed. See WP:Prof. Xxanthippe (talk) 09:07, 10 June 2016 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.