Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Millie McKenzie

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. $Salvio$ 11:25, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Millie McKenzie[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't think this wrestler is particularly notable - the references don't particularly point that way - and one match in NXT UK doesn't scream notability. A BEFORE search didn't bring up anything all that interesting that screamed notability. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 07:55, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 07:55, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:57, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:57, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete She is a WWE reject and the places she worked in aren't notable enough to merit her own article. Maybe in a few years she might attain enough notability she can get her own article,as of now she hasn't done anything notable. I also don't think Sendai Girls' Pro Wrestling has much notability, there are various more notable wrestling promotions all over the world that do not have their own articles. There are countless more notable wrestlers than her who do not have their own article yet. Dilbaggg (talk) 12:42, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:30, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment User:Coolabahapple I don't see why this needs to be included in women related discussion just because she is a women, does that mean every article involving women no matter how low its notability is needs to be related to women related discussion? Do every male wrestler gets named in men related discussion? Just a simple query, nothing else. Dilbaggg (talk) 14:50, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

first up i reckon the more editors that are made aware of afds the better, i add afds to relevant afd lists so that editors who have them and/or wikiproject announcements on their watchlists are notified of the afd, as this article is a women bio i have added it to the women afd list, on your point about a "men afd list" i am unaware of there being one (see Category:Wikipedia deletion sorting), you may wish to follow this up at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Deletion sorting. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:05, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

She's also English, so it's included in England related discussions. The categorization is completely proper, and I thank Coolabahapple for their valuable work sorting AfDs. pburka (talk) 21:50, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.