Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Militrex Kosova Defense

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz Read! Talk! 23:15, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Militrex Kosova Defense[edit]

Militrex Kosova Defense (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Likely hoax. Only source is a single article (and another web site republishing the same article) citing claims about this company to "social networks":

Ndërkaq në rrjetet sociale është publikuar një dokument në të cilin thuhet se kompania “Militrex KOSOVA Defense”, do të merret me prodhimin e dronëve.

("Meanwhile, a document has been published on social networks in which it is stated that the company "Militrex KOSOVA Defense" will deal with the production of drones.")

Files associated with this company have previously been deleted on Commons (cf. c:Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by IllyStar, c:Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Eron Lushaj, etc); many of these documents and images were obvious forgeries (e.g. poorly edited photos, US military photos reposted as "Kosovo military", emblems of a nonexistent Kosovo air force; see also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kosovo Air Force).

Omphalographer (talk) 23:17, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, I can guarantee it that I don't have anything to do with the users that you just mentioned; IllyStar and Eron Lushaj.
About the deletion nomination, I am not okay and I don't support the deletion of this Article because it is a real fact that the written content is real and is is actual. The references used are the onliest that are circulating last days. SO I would suggest to remove ''Nomination for deletion'' tag in this article. The fact that you mentioned are not enough to delete this article. Best regards!
@Omphalographer Kokenspun (talk) 19:17, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails notability guidelines. I was unable to find any additional news about this. Maxcreator (talk) 19:57, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.