Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miley Cyrus International

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedied by Bbb23(A7: No explanation of significance (real person/animal/organization/web content/organized event). Sperril (talk) 02:07, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Miley Cyrus International

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Speedy delete tag is being continuously removed so I'll take this to AfD. No indication of notability is given for this fan club. Eeekster (talk) 23:16, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per nom. Also, I think there may be some sock-puppetry waddling around this article. Sperril (talk) 23:22, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per A7. No indication of importance or significance. —teb728 t c 23:27, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It's unfair. I red all the rules. And I followed them. This is not a promotional article. I just want to tell the history of MCI. What did I do wrong? Tell me and I'll change it but please don't delete it. Loverdion17/03/2013 20:47
Speedy delete - Per A7. No indication of significance, not to mention poor spelling and grammar application. öBrambleberry of RiverClan 23:48, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You are just being trivial. You aren't fair. This article don't like you and you want to make all possible to delete it. Please, what do you get doing it? Loverdion17/03/2013 20:56
Great, I'm not giving up. Do you know what? Delete it but I'm coming back in 2 month. I'm going to pay for this. You are going to see what a credit card can make. It's going to be a private article! Loverdion17/03/2013 20:59

What do you mean by that? 069952497a^{Comments and complaints}_{Stuff I've done} 00:15, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No independent sources have been provided, just the organization's own web site, Facebook, and Twitter pages. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 00:09, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I can't find any independant sources online either. 069952497a^{Comments and complaints}_{Stuff I've done} 00:12, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"keep it" Yes you can find. Are you searching by the righ way? Loverdion — Preceding unsigned comment added by Loverdion (talk • contribs) 00:23, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:29, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

~~*Do not delete~~ Vote by banned sock of user:Hernan 12 Sperril (talk) 01:39, 18 March 2013 (UTC) The organization is telling it's history. There's no other meaning. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Loverdion (talk • contribs) 00:31, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

- "Wanting to tell it's [sic] history" doesn't make the organization notable. Eeekster (talk) 00:54, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep it That's right. It's a object article. The organization want to tell it's history. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hernan 12 (talk • contribs) 00:33, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete A7 Article says it all by itself; not a club endorsed by Cyrus in any way. Nate • (chatter) 01:07, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Nothing in the article to say what makes this company notable --5 albert square (talk) 01:22, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete - I have tagged the article for speedy deletion under WP:A7 per the arguments above. Michaelzeng7 (talk) 01:24, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.