Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Milan Luković (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:47, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Milan Luković[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The previous AfD appears to have been kept based off of Assertion of notability votes, but did not actually supply any references or sources that would in fact pass WP:GNG. The assertion was that since the subject played on a national team, he is therefore notable, even though the sport specific guideline, WP:NHOCKEY (which itself is still subject to GNG even if a player meets one of the criteria) specifically calls out only the top division national teams to have presumed notability. The player mostly played in the third tier of the IIHF championship, not for The World Championship, just to earn promotion (which they earned in 2008–09, but only up to the second tier before being relegated back down again). As shown in his stats sheet, he has also not played in a league that has presumed notability as researched and documented in the league assessment for presumed player notability, an essay written to document leagues that have been known to be covered well enough in media that GNG-relevant sources should be able to be found.

For a similarly disproved Assertion of Notability, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bogdan Janković (2nd nomination). Yosemiter (talk) 21:16, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:27, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:27, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:31, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: per nom. I suppose I can't rail too much at people being unfamiliar with sports notability criteria when those who are declined to participate in the AfD, but both of those Keep voters are veteran editors who should at least have troubled themselves to glance at the pertinent criteria first. Ravenswing 13:13, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom and sport notability guidelines. I went to the Serbia national ice hockey team article and he isn't even a player anymore - apparently he's now an assistant, so depending on where his coaching career takes him, we may revisit an article down the road, but for now, it's WP:TOOSOON. TimTempleton ^(talk) ^(cont) 00:18, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 09:43, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails to meet both WP:GNG and WP:NHOCKEY. Participating in lower tiers of IIHF events does not meet the notability criteria. Papaursa (talk) 17:39, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.