Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mikroglottika

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Erik9 (talk) 00:01, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mikroglottika[edit]

I'm unable to locate secondary reliable sources to determine notability. Possibly there are some in German? Chzz ► 08:59, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Hi, I'll search for them. I agree with you it's necessary to add other references. --Auslli (talk) 09:56, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I found the book can be sold in the major internet bookstores, and I don't know if that could be referenced, beceause i thnik this is publicity, but certainly is a notable source.--Auslli (talk) 07:53, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 15:12, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I think we should be very careful about deleting peer-reviewed, (This journal is edited by three doctors from different universities [1], [2]) academic journals published by major int'l academic publishers (Peter Lang (publishing company)) that may otherwise not meet regular notability guidelines, especially when those journals are themselves used as sources for other Wikipedia articles (See Leonese language). These journals are a valuable resource for Wikipedia, and I think this is a good example of a situation when we should ignore the rules (a policy) — in this case WP:N (a guideline) — and keep this. — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 15:47, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Basically because knowledge and specifically academic portals and scholar research should never be banned from Wikipedia. --Eldrewitsch (talk) 11:46, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.