Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mikelis Brizga

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Yunshui ^雲 _水 13:27, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mikelis Brizga[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: as insufficiently notable individual. PROD contested so AFD initiated. Quis separabit? 14:24, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 14:57, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 14:57, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the references in the article are significant coverage in reliable newspaper sources to pass WP:GNG Atlantic306 (talk) 16:19, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Meets WP:GNG. The sources given in the article demonstrate notability. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:50, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, meets WP:GNG, articles in major metropolitan (that are available nationwide) papers is enough for me. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:32, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.