Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Worrall

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Soft delete. L Faraone 00:08, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Worrall

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I was on the fence with this one at first, but after searching there is not enough WP:SIGCOV to justify an article. Subject fails WP:GNG due to lack of coverage in reliable sources. There is a brief mention in an art review and everything else that I found was either a listing or a reprint of his Wikipedia page. FoolMeOnce2Times (talk) 19:20, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:23, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:23, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:23, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:23, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I agree with nom, after checking some of the refs. Johnbod (talk) 03:07, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.