Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Stathis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 18:17, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Stathis

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources in the article are almost all either run by him or fringe and not acceptable for a BLP. The CNN source has a one sentence mention. His books are self-published. I couldn't find anything convincing when I searched. I don't think his appearance on the Thom Hartmann show etc is enough. Doug Weller (talk) 14:59, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 15:39, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 15:39, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:07, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, sst✈^discuss 05:17, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I found some links at News and browser but nothing convincingly better. Pinging tagger WereSpielChequers as the only other tagger Toddst is unfortunately no longer active. SwisterTwister talk 06:22, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- I rarely add catimprove to an article, when I do it usually means as with this one that it is so far outside my area of expertise that I can't properly categorise it. In this case I added living people and catimprove. Then came back later and removed something 404 sourced and negative..... As for the deletion, notability is marginal at best and the subject is contentious - deletion is probably for the best unless others can find good sources. Ϣere SpielChequers 16:13, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor ^Talk! 04:21, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.