Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Pronovost

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 01:39, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Pronovost

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not appear to meet notability guidelines. Some local media attention has been gained, but the actual effects of Pronovost, Powerband, and its parent company are questionable. I encourage you to simply visit Powerband's website at powerbandinternet.com and tell me what you think. Also, visit crunchbase.com/company/pronovost-technologies Whittledaughn (talk) 01:14, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:50, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:50, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep If he is not already notable, he is close to it. He got quite a bit of local coverage due to his White House gig, and his company has received attention in the techie press. --MelanieN (talk) 00:54, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000^(talk) 20:44, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep He seems just above the horizon in terms of notability for an entrepreneur. That his company haven't impacted anyone other than himself appears not to be a criterion for deletion. --gilgongo (talk) 12:26, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:28, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Meets minimal notability requirements.LM2000 (talk) 00:47, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.