Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike London (journalist)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Big Dom 16:24, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mike London (journalist)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an entirely negative WP:BLP1E which seems non-notable apart from a controversy. Information might be mentioned in another article but keeping this inexpandable stub is dangerous. - filelake shoe 10:41, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 16:35, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 16:35, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 16:36, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - as a One Event hit piece, per nom. Carrite (talk) 17:18, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Nom is spot on, a one event personality, with the very weak one event. Dennis Brown (talk) 19:17, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, a case of WP:ONEEVENT. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 21:46, 22 May 2011 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.