Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Chen

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) --VersaceSpace 🌃 03:21, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Chen[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Mike Chen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Out of the 11 listed sources, only 3 non user-generated sources have any significant coverage. 1 of them (grow.acorns.com) appears to be a promotional blog of sorts run by Acorns (company), an investment app. the rest of the 9 are either his YouTube or reddit content, or only contain passing mentions in context of a controversy. TryKid [dubious – discuss] 02:20, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep I see the BBC, CNBC, the Dallas Morning News, and The Business Journals. Seems to be notable. --evrik (talk) 03:31, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 05:11, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 05:12, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: cnbc 10 matches for chen, The Dallas Morning News 15 matches for Chen, the article at the very least has two reliable sources providing significant coverage. Sources 1 and 13 may count as an additional two. Keep per GNG. Justiyaya 07:15, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: There was coverage on Mike Chen in major news sources, such as CNBC, BBC, and The Dallas Morning News. He was also nominated for a Shorty Award. lullabying (talk) 09:38, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: The first two sources seem to both provide independent SIGCOV from reliable sources – article's in rough shape, but I see no reason to delete entirely. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 09:50, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Full disclosure, I came here from a notice on DYK talk. We have significant coverage, as has been called out above. It is easy to find non-trivial references for this person. Bruxton (talk) 14:20, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. YouTubers with millions of subscribers are usually notable, and as demonstrated above and in a simple google-news search reliable source are available aplenty for Chen.--Mvqr (talk) 14:50, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mike_Chen&oldid=1095746379"