Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Ahern (news anchor) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:13, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Ahern (news anchor)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable local news anchor. No evidence of substantial coverage in secondary sources. Previously nominated for AfD in 2008 but discussion was closed due to sock puppet activity. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 09:38, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 09:38, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 09:38, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 09:38, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 09:38, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 09:38, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete local broadcast journalists are not default notable. The deletion discussion 12 years ago did not progress because of procedural concerns. These have kept us with poorly sourced articles for way too long.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:46, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The awards I could find were very local and non-notable, and the sources are only cursory and routine, and also very low profile. So nothing really for passing the general notability guideline. 67.243.20.177 (talk) 22:09, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.