Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike's Gym

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Secret ^account 02:43, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mike's Gym[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD was removed with no reason. I don't see significant coverage of the gym itself. The fact that notable fighters have trained there is WP:NOTINHERITED. The other sources are the fact that it burned down and another saying it was rebuilt--neither of which indicates notability.Mdtemp (talk) 19:02, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Mdtemp (talk) 19:02, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:ORG. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 02:52, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:22, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:22, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There have been some notable fighters who trained there, but notability is not inherited. WP:ORG says "An organization is not notable merely because a notable person or event was associated with it." I didn't find the significant independent coverage from multiple sources that WP:GNG requires. Papaursa (talk) 04:59, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.