Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mikaela Phillips

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 10:12, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mikaela Phillips[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This biography appears to be about a non-notable actress. None of the sources provided qualify as reliable sources for the purpose of notability, and none of the work she has done would qualify her as a notable actress. I cannot find anything on Google that would change my opinion. Someguy1221 (talk) 23:19, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and per the fact that this person isn't going to try to improve the article. gwickwire^talk_editing 23:23, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no reliable sources, no notability. Was prodded for these reasons, prod removed by the author without improvement. Huon (talk) 23:24, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:01, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:01, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete probable WP:AUTOBIO and blatant self promotion. LibStar (talk) 00:52, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Not notable enough; none of the films the actress has acted in have Wikipedia articles on them, no reliable sources in the article and even a Google search gives nothing remarkable. smt cha hal 03:47, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:N. The subject does not appear in Google News searches and regular Google searches yield only Twitter accounts. Rotideypoc41352 (talk) 23:41, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, the claim of notability seems to centre around a single appearance in a bit role on a notable TV series, and some promotional work for something called "Magic Wars". Unfortunately, I don't buy that argument. There is no secondary coverage of this person or the role she has played that I can find, which leads me to conclude this person doesn't meet WP:N just yet. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 00:13, 31 March 2013 (UTC).[reply]
Delete For the same reasons identified above.Kabirat (talk) 09:08, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.