Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mikael Sandberg (political scientist)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 15:44, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mikael Sandberg (political scientist)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Mikael Sandberg does not seem to be a very notable scientist. Google doesn't bring up any biographical info, and he does not appear to be frequently cited. 70.82.134.41 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 15:27, 26 March 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Note: this is not my AFD, I'm good-faith submitting it for the IP who wanted it. tedder (talk) 12:02, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:05, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:05, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Subject does not seem to meet any of the criteria of WP:PROF. Finding sources via a Google search is difficult, and I see no evidence his work is highly cited, has won any awards, holds a chair, or any other criterion that would make this person notable. Perhaps if others can find sources that I'm missing I could reconsider. PDCook (talk) 19:01, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Top GS cites are 14, 13, 8, 6..... Does not make WP:Prof #1 or anything else. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:36, 6 April 2010 (UTC).[reply]
Delete A competent scholar, but not especially notable. Mid-career, no unusually significant publications. His webpage at Halmstad doesn't have a cv, but a Google Scholar search doesn't reveal anything special. RJC ^Talk_Contribs 15:52, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.