Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mihailo Kravcev

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 13:37, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mihailo Kravcev

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Maybe it's a lack of facility with Serbian, but I'm just not finding anything to indicate this person's biography is justified under WP:NCREATIVE or other applicable criteria. ☆ Bri (talk) 01:17, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Yugoslavia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:22, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:23, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. Atlantic306 (talk) 14:09, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Atlantic306 (talk) 14:09, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment someone who reads Serbian should assess the Google news results, as he is frequently mentioned there. Other items to assess include this article, a second article, a third article, this fourth possible source, this fifth source, a similar book review, a sixth item that looks like an interview, a seventh source that seems to be related to the book, this eight item, a profile in an artist directory that might be RS, a and this ninth item that appears to be a review. So there you go. 198.58.175.190 (talk) 04:28, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep. @Bri: in the future, please do not randomly nominate articles with subjects whose coverage is primarily in non-Latin alphabets and then claim you can't find any sources. His Serbian wikipedia article is right there linked on the left-hand side, is well-sourced, and even one of his books has its own article. —Мандичка^YO 😜 04:49, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment the Serbian article has five sources in total. Are they any good?198.58.175.190 (talk) 05:01, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep has coverage in Serbian reliable sources as listed above so passes WP:GNG, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 14:30, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.