Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mihai grunfeld
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Secret account 07:11, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Mihai grunfeld[edit]
- Mihai grunfeld (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I see no particular indication that this individual might pass WP:PROF. None of the sources provided points to that conclusion. One is a directory entry, one is a blurb on a blog post and one is from the subject's own website. Plainly, none of these fulfills the "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" requirement of WP:GNG.
On a lighter note, it's rather amusing that User:Hispanic Studies Asst, the single-purpose account who created this article, and presumably a student at Vassar, titled this "Mihai grunfeld". Forget about the umlaut in Grünfeld; it seems not all Vassar students know that surnames are capitalized! - Biruitorul Talk 18:41, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:49, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:49, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Too few citations in Gscholar for WP:PROF C1. I detect some press mentions of his book Leaving: Memories of Romania but it's held in very few Worldcat libraries [1], and I've not been able to find full-length reviews of his books to satisfy WP:AUTHOR. WP:BIO coverage is not evident from the Gnews link above, either. RayTalk 21:47, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.