Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Might and Magic Tribute: Book of Ceth
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 06:49, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Might and Magic Tribute: Book of Ceth[edit]
Non-notable fanmade game, fails WP:SOFTWARE. Andre (talk) 00:24, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Reluctant delete; maybe when it gets a bit more media coverage this could change. PurplePlatypus 00:56, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete same reasons as the rest of these (reliable sources, etc) but this one has the added bonus of not even being a completed game yet. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 01:15, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. -- moe.RON Let's talk | done 01:56, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Danny Lilithborne 01:57, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. EVula 05:01, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Non-notable unsourced fan game. The Kinslayer 10:05, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as nominator. Combination 12:45, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - All information here is notable, that's why someone added it. The burden of proof needs to be shifted to prevent this mass deletion of articles. Rōnin 22:34, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Lack of reliable sources. Ronin - why should the burden be shifted? That wouldn't really make any sense. Wickethewok 19:35, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.