Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mighindoala

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Mailer Diablo 00:06, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mighindoala

Seems farfetched. Delete Ac1983fan 19:34, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep - 330 Google hits for it. If it's a real place and the facts are as presented, I think it should stay. However, the article needs to be cleaned up. EuroSong 19:38, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep as per eurosong. see; multimap Mighindoala Veej 20:40, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

weak keep, as long as it's a real place - we've got smaller ones here. Grutness...wha? 04:27, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It is a real place (see here on the county council webpage), and it is one of the most tragic cases of depopulation in Transylvania due to the departure of the Transylvanian Saxons. Mihai -^talk 12:45, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It's real :-) BTW, here are some pics from it: http://images.google.com/images?q=Mighindoala bogdan 13:27, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.