Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MigdalOr
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:17, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- MigdalOr (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Small congregation that lasted for two years, and is now defunct. Fails WP:ORG. Jayjg (talk) 23:28, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: The Jerusalem Post article only mentions this congregation in passing, and thus fails as a source. The college newspaper links are broken, but even given the presumption that it qualifies as a reliable source - not generally the case for small colleges - the article titles don't give the impression they are about the subject. Almost all the statements the article makes have been citation tagged for some time, and a review of the article's edit history suggest that the notability of the subject's been at issue for years. Ravenswing 16:23, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:41, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:41, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Doesn't even claim notability, much less demonstrate it. --MelanieN (talk) 20:13, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and Redirect to the main Orthodox Jewish feminism article where it would serve as a good example of that outlook. It's WP:NOTABLE as a short-lived example of an Orthodox-oriented prayer group focused on women. Looks like it wanted to be another Shira Hadasha group. Pity that the original writer has been inactive. IZAK (talk) 21:00, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.