Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miegakure

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 00:48, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Miegakure[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable software: coverage seems largely to spring from its mention in a web comic, not a reliable source. Other than that it was a runner up in a minor contest. Not clear it will ever be notable: few independent games make much impact. But if it is that can be revisited after the game is released: WP is not a crystal ball. JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 12:54, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 16:16, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:17, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not in any way knowledgeable about the WP requirements for notability at all, but there is some stuff I think might qualify as notability - it's been covered on Rock Paper Shotgun here (not sure about this one, it is a blog even if it's a blog by well-known gaming journalists), by the PCGamerUK podcast here, and I think I remember it being covered in the print edition. Plus, being nominated for an Independent Games Festival award is actually a pretty big deal. Things like Darwinia, Audiosurf, World of Goo, and Machinarium have been award winners there. Like I said, I've no idea if that actually means it meets the verifiability criteria. Gonna attempt to find it in old PCGs now. Supersheep (talk) 02:53, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep per coverage found above, plus coverage at Kotaku, a Gamasutra interview, Shacknews - and that's just the first four results of the WikiProject Video Games reliable sources search. --Teancum (talk) 13:06, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – I can verify Teancum's findings above. Looks like notability is sufficiently asserted here. There is also [1] which is a nomination, but I don't know if it amounts to much. –MuZemike 07:50, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.