Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Midtown footbridge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 02:03, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Midtown footbridge

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Although I generally think places are notable, I can't see how this bridge is. Woogee (talk) 03:51, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This fails WP:CRYSTAL, WP:V, WP:RS, WP:N, and the list goes on... As such, WP:DELETE. (Sorry for getting carried away with policy links) Ham tech person 03:58, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator. In addition to sounding inherently nonnotable, there are no reliable sources to verify notability. The one source that is linked suggests that the author may be trying to use Wikipedia to get support for the proposal to build the bridge. --Nick—^Contact/_Contribs 04:00, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. There is only one news article in Google News describing its proposal. Dew Kane (talk) 04:18, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Just because it's proposed can't save it from the wrath of WP:Deletion policy. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 05:30, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This article is a single line about a bridge that may not even be made. Fails Notability, partly Crystal and possibly more guidelines. --Andromedabluesphere440 (talk) 13:55, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:01, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:02, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Planned or proposed infrastructure only has notability if it has received significant coverage. One article does not make significant coverage unless it is something on the order of a NY Times cover story. - ¢Spender1983 (talk) 02:24, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- I wondered about redirect to Rideau Canal, but that article does not list bridges, let alone WP:CRYSTAL-ball bridges. Peterkingiron (talk) 19:49, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.