Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Midreshet Tavor for Zionist Leadership

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. plicit 11:15, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Midreshet Tavor for Zionist Leadership[edit]

Midreshet Tavor for Zionist Leadership (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not seem notable. Article cites three outlets, which I've machine translated. All article are fluff pieces on the subject, which is fine and can help constitute notability, but Emek seems wholly unreliable. Ynet is probably reliable. I would lean unreliable with Mida. Remsense 15:12, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep I'm wondering what sort of notability one looks for in a school. Wikipedia guidelines seem to indicate the bar is set at notability within one's field and how high is that bar for "the field of schools"? Are only Harvard and Juilliard notable because they are in the news whenever some famous alumnus is appointed to SCOTUS or wins an Oscar? Initially, it appears that one can make a good argument that since other similarly notable schools have no article, then this should also have no article, but then maybe the WP:Be bold rule applies? So there's a bad article or two. I found another good article demonstrating that a) this school exists and that b) it's written about online and in newspapers and serves a role in society and in IDF military preparedness. 15:24, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
  • @DRosenbach: it sounds like you were reading WP:NPROF which covers people in academia. Schools are covered under WP:GNG or if the institution is for-profit then the GNG WP:NCORP sourcing guidelines might come into play. See WP:NSCHOOL. S0091 (talk) 17:27, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:24, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Herald (Benison) (talk) 10:14, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.