Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Midnight Club: Los Angeles soundtrack

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:43, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Midnight Club: Los Angeles soundtrack[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NALBUMS and WP:GNG. Topic does not meet either music notability criteria or general notability criteria. Per 15. at WP:VGSCOPE, merging the content to Midnight Club: Los Angeles would be inappropriate. The1337gamer (talk) 19:29, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. The1337gamer (talk) 19:30, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. The1337gamer (talk) 19:30, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per nomination. Consensus is this sort of stuff doesn't even really belong in the parent article, let alone a separate one. Sergecross73 msg me 19:47, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It would be fine to merge only if there were sources that even discussed this soundtrack... Until then, the article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) It had no meaningful hits in a video game reliable sources custom Google search. There are no worthwhile redirect targets (not even Midnight Club: Los Angeles). If someone finds more (non-English and offline) sources, please {{ping}} me. czar 18:31, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: fails WP:GNG, WP:NMUSIC and there are no good independent sources to be able to create even a stub – without them it's just a track listing, and Wikipedia isn't a listings directory. Richard3120 (talk) 20:27, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.