Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Midas english school

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete. The result was Speedy Delete under G5 (non-admin closure) Jupitus Smart 17:24, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Midas english school

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability found in article or online. Fram (talk) 14:45, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 14:45, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 14:45, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:41, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non-notable. Classic example of why schools should be speediable. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 04:25, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. I can find zero significant coverage. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:15, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not notable. Heart ^(talk) 06:32, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It does not meet any notability criteria. Secondary and reliable sources are missing. ✍A.WagnerC (talk) 00:47, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per WP:G5. Non-notable school; created by a blocked user's sockpuppet. -- Ab207 (talk) 06:54, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Even if we had agreement that secondary schools were notable, this would be insufficient for an article. DGG ( talk ) 09:57, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete: Concur with Ab207. It was made by a user who was evading an indef block. Should be speedily deleted under WP:G5.--Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 18:40, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No reliable sources, no evidence of notability. Fails GNG. TheDreamBoat (talk) 00:57, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.