Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Micky Barnea

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lacks independent, significant coverage as an individual, rather than connected sources or passing mentions. RL0919 (talk) 07:53, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Micky Barnea

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Failing GNG and BIO. A lawyer doing his job. Sources are a mixture of lawyer directory profiles, some self-authored articles or blog pieces by the subject or (as far as I can tell) press releases which are primary sources. There is some editorial coverage, however this is primarily about the cases where the law firm and/or the subject are mentioned passing. This is insufficient to establish required notability of the subject. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 07:09, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 07:09, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 07:09, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 07:09, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This is a classic example of someone who has intersected with notable entities but does not have independent notability in themselves. Cosmic Sans (talk) 12:48, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable actor.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:05, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not notable enough to warrant an encyclopedia entry. Wm335td (talk) 19:19, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete. He does run a large law firm and is regularly given blurbs in media. However, the current article is promotional and I'm unable to find in-depth coverage in my BEFORE.Icewhiz (talk) 15:08, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.