Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mick Sweda

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was ‎ keep. NYC Guru (talk) 21:08, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mick Sweda (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:GNG --FMSky (talk) 06:27, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, thats what i had initially done. But then a single-purpose account, likely Sweda himself, popped up to remove the redirect without an explanation and restore the article --FMSky (talk) 21:57, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Mbdfar (although he did say Weak keep) and WP:HEY. I found three secondary reliable sources to back up most of what was already in the article, one of which goes into much detail about the subject or his family. I also added new sourced information that wasn't there previously, and made things more wiki-friendly. Note that there are many sources mentioning the subject as part of BulletBoys, but those are mostly passing mentions and therefore not really useful for a biography. But I think much of what is included now would not fit well in either of the band articles. StonyBrook babble 22:45, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I acknowledge your efforts to improve the article, but I think it's telling that you were able to find only one source that talks about any of Sweda's works outside of BulletBoys and King Kobra, and that was in his hometown newspaper (Merced). Perhaps not enough to qualify for "significant" coverage at WP:SIGCOV, but I will accept the consensus of others in this discussion. Also, the fact that he has a wife and son is not particularly encyclopedic even though a newspaper said it. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 14:47, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:16, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:28, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep per both WP:MUSICBIO.6 and the sourcing improvements made since listing. Probably still needs another edit pass but a merge would probably not improve the state of the encyclopedia as a whole. —siroχo 07:58, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.