Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michelle Yu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:56, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Michelle Yu

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An article about a local sportscaster with two references with no detail establishing notability. Outside of the two sources listed, I was unable to find anything on the individual. And those two sources don't have much detail anyway just like the article. Prior to nominating this article, I added the deletion prod template stating that it "Fails WP:GNG". It was removed because the editor stated in his edit summary that "it has a ref". But these references don't have much to them. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:14, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - She has coverage in the NY Times for her marriage, and she is the author of two books. I've added that info and references into the article as well as updated her position as anchor of NY1 the news channel in New York City. -- Fuzheado | Talk 07:45, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fuzheado, it's great that you added more to the article, but unfortunately that New York Times article is nothing that's really newsworthy and those books she's written aren't exactly notable especially when it's sourced with a review. At this point, it looks more like a resume than an actually biography of a notable person. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 14:22, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:19, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:19, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:19, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:26, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:52, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.