Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michelle Stein-Evers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:05, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Michelle Stein-Evers[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:BIO and WP:PROF. very little coverage revealed in gnews and GScholar LibStar (talk) 13:29, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:04, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:04, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Notability seems too slender yet. WP:Too soon. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:42, 4 June 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 02:29, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:39, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:25, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. She seems to have basically left academia, so I don't think WP:PROF is appropriate (nor that she passes it). Instead we should be looking for WP:GNG-based notability. But there, again, the subject appears to fall short. The references given may be enough to support the factual claims of the article but they are useless for notability. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:28, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.