Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michelle Hinn
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. KrakatoaKatie 09:14, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
From speedy. Does not seems to be notable Alex Bakharev 08:21, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:BIO. Scattered mentions on Google, none asserting her notability.--Húsönd 17:09, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Very few mentions, gaming magazine mention seems to be a list rather then an article, can't find any other notable mention.Changing vote to keep after addition of enough source material and establishment of notability. Seraphimblade 18:28, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Save? Sorry, I'm a newbie and I don't know how this system works. The gaming magazine was a list and everyone on the list had a paragraph about them but they were not placed in any nummerical order. I realize that this is about the same issue but [this article http://www.lis.uiuc.edu/oc/news/displaynews.html?source=y2vK4.iJRv-rvWinwbnhgQ==&year=hTs0L3zJE5-LUovrFiob9w==] does tell more of the story than the gaming magazine. There's also [another source http://www.igda.org/community/volunteer_mvp.php] mentioning the IGDA most valuable player 2006 award, which is not on the same "top 100" topic. vrgrrl
- Keep. Number of Google hits is one factor to consider but isn't dispositive. Cited sources show her recognition within the field. JamesMLane t c 08:25, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.