Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michelle Fecteau

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 03:21, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Michelle Fecteau[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough in-depth sourcing to meet WP:GNG, and doesn't qualify for WP:NPOL. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:25, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:25, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Rhode Island-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:04, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:27, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:27, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The nommer is clearly a much nicer and better person than I am — I would have requested speedy on this, as I can't see one single thing suggesting importance of any sort. (I do get a whiff of vanity and/or COI editing, though, although no evidence thereof, obvs.) Fails WP:GNG / WP:BIO, so just get rid of it, and looking at the creator's talk page, maybe salt as well? --DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:19, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete state board of education members are not default notable. I live in Detroit, and have lived in Michigan essentially my entire life. I have never heard of Fecteau at all, and I keep up with politics. Michigan elects a huge number of boards state wide, not just the board of education, but 3 university boards. We do not consider all holders of such positions notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:12, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete reads like a resume. Nothing notable that I can see, beyond what I would expect from another person in her same position. Oaktree b (talk) 22:44, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Although a statewide elected position, I don't think being a member of the board of education is enough to pass WP:NPOL automatically; she would need WP:GNG-based in-depth coverage of her and her political positions (rather than mere mentions of those topics in broader articles about something else). We currently don't have sources like that and I didn't find any on searching. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:54, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.