Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michele Noonan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I'm sorry Truebloodforever but the consensus is that she's not notable yet. Also, please read WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:31, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Michele Noonan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominating on behalf of 67.246.30.214. The user does not believe that her accomplishments meet the notability requirements: her Big Brother appearance only reached fourth place, and her other activities are minor. I don't have an opinion on this. --Carnildo (talk) 23:02, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:31, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable for her medical/scientific activities; I can't judge her notability for having appeared on Big Brother, but it doesn't seem very impressive based on Google News. As a neuroscientist she gets a few hits at Google Scholar, not enough for notability. As the editor of a self-named pop-health website she is not notable. --MelanieN (talk) 17:52, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Respectable start to an academic career with GS cites of 76, 23, 17, 10, 1 but nowhere near enough for WP:Prof#C1. It looks as she has abandoned this career for the delights of celebrity culture. She will have to find her notability there. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:57, 17 July 2011 (UTC).[reply]
DO NOT DELETE. Many other wikipedia articles on Big Brother nonwinners exist and have not been deleted due to notability, including Monet Stunson, Howie Gordon, Holly King (actress), Janelle Pierzina. Chima Simone, Ragan Fox andSheila Kennedy. If this article is removed the others should be considered. Besides 66 day appearance on Big Brother the subject of this article also won two reality TV shows, Foursome and Baggage. Truebloodforever (talk) 06:50, 18 July 2011 (UTC) — Truebloodforever (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Delete Thank you for nominating this on my behalf, Carnildo. The article is cleverly written because it makes it sound like she has done more than she actually has. Generally, the rule is that ONLY Big Brother/Survivor WINNERS get articles unless someone else in the season does something notable as well. She has guest starred on two low-rated cable shows since then, and has invented an herbal supplement that is not well known. You get a wiki article after you're famous, not TO get famous 67.246.30.214 (talk) 00:21, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete. I'm not sure how we would judge the realitytvworld.com reference in terms of a reliable secondary source, but I certainly can't find any other secondary sources that address this person in detail. Most of the references in the article are to primary sources of one type or another. —gorgan_almighty (talk) 15:52, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete independent sources are lacking. Stuartyeates (talk) 23:32, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.