Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michal Levin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is that the subject does not meet Wikipedia's notability standards. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:12, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Michal Levin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All sources in this article are primary sources. Searches for significant independent coverage come up empty. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 20:29, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:58, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:58, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spirituality-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:58, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No proof of notability found. gidonb (talk) 23:43, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

After reviewing the material I have made the following edits and have included the following independent sources:

Gary Baumgarten interview for Newstalk online 2007
Kindred Spirit Magazine article 2015
Telegraph Newspaper article 2002

NB the three books cited, written by Levin, are published by independent and established publishing houses - Hodder & Stoughton, Dorling Kindersley and Gill & McMillan — Preceding unsigned comment added by JosephineH1 (talk • contribs) — JosephineH1 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

For scanned copy of Hilary Pearson's Nov/Dec 2014 Kindred Spirit Article (no longer available online) email [email protected] — Preceding unsigned comment added by JosephineH1 (talk • contribs)

Comment @JosephineH1: Interviews given by the subject and articles written by the subject are not considered independent sources. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 11:54, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 21:00, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable meditation promoter.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:34, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not meet notability guidelines. Hrodvarsson (talk) 23:02, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.