Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michaela Horáková

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:07, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Michaela Horáková

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Apparently one role only. —Мандичка^YO 😜 05:38, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:00, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:17, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:17, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This article probably could have been nominated for CSD A7, given that it's been around for several years and notability hasn't really been established beyond an IMDb profile. – numbermaniac 08:18, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Every actress who exists is not automatically entitled to a Wikipedia article just because she's had a role — the notability test is not just having had roles itself, but the depth and breadth and volume of reliable source coverage she did or didn't receive in media for having roles. But there are no reliable sources being cited here at all, and an actress who had just one supporting part and then apparently never acted again is profoundly unlikely to have the required coverage. Bearcat (talk) 14:45, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Obviously fails the WP:GNG and the WP:NACTRESS. -- LACaliNYC ✉ 22:05, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I just realized that as she only has one role that we know of, a redirect to Anne Frank: The Whole Story makes sense, and I should have done that instead of the AfD. @Bearcat, Numbermaniac, and LACaliNYC: what do you think? —Мандичка^YO 😜 04:09, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Makes sense, just create the redirect after the article is deleted, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 19:35, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.