Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Wilson (ice hockey)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:41, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Wilson (ice hockey)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 05:16, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 17:29, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 17:29, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 17:29, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Another one of several hundred NN creations from an editor who eventually was community banned from new article creation. This subject has had a long career in the mid-minors (with a couple of brief stints in European minor leagues) without distinction, and I'm at a loss to see the basis upon which he could ever have been declared notable. Complete failure of NHOCKEY, no evidence he meets the GNG beyond routine sports coverage debarred by WP:ROUTINE from supporting notability. Ravenswing 05:04, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Simple, at no time ever played in the top tier of hockey, and not even in the second tier; 29 years old and most likely never will make the NHL. Easy delete. Rockypedia (talk) 04:18, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable hockey player.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:04, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.