Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Wachtler
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:19, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Michael Wachtler (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:ANYBIO, WP:PROF, and WP:NAUTHOR. WP:AUTOBIO as has been extensively edited by the subject diff Hemiauchenia (talk) 14:18, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Hemiauchenia (talk) 14:18, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per above, and most every sentence wholly fails WP:EDITORIAL User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk 15:12, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per everything above. JurassicClassic767 (talk | contribs) 17:09, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America1000 16:28, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. North America1000 16:28, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per above. Lythronaxargestes (talk | contribs) 19:09, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
- What are the above supporting: Keep or delete?? Xxanthippe.
- @Lythronaxargestes, JurassicClassic767, and Dunkleosteus77: to clarify for the closer, are you saying keep or delete?--Kevmin § 01:10, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- "Per above" clearly implies delete. Hemiauchenia (talk) 01:13, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- I just put "support" since I saw Dunkleosteus put it, but I'll change it to "delete" if needed. JurassicClassic767 (talk | contribs) 02:18, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, delete. I saw two supports so I put down support instead of delete. Lythronaxargestes (talk | contribs) 02:27, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- I just put "support" since I saw Dunkleosteus put it, but I'll change it to "delete" if needed. JurassicClassic767 (talk | contribs) 02:18, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- "Per above" clearly implies delete. Hemiauchenia (talk) 01:13, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Lythronaxargestes, JurassicClassic767, and Dunkleosteus77: to clarify for the closer, are you saying keep or delete?--Kevmin § 01:10, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- What are the above supporting: Keep or delete?? Xxanthippe.
- Delete (since when do we !vote "support" at AfD...?) Notability as author, researcher, or per WP:GNG not demonstrated. The bits that are usually good hooks for a go at GNG are entirely unsourced (e.g. the tussle with the police). The vainglorious autobiographical tone would require a complete rewrite in any case. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 20:23, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete all the taxa mention are nomen nudum from what I can tell. No supporting secondary sources at all and no citations to the purported taxa named. (Angiosperms in the Permian? very much pseudo)Kevmin § 22:48, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. Tendentiousness and lack of supporting sources. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:25, 29 August 2020 (UTC).
- Delete per everything already said. Ichthyovenator (talk) 17:06, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per everything... we have standards, people.--SilverTiger12 (talk) 01:44, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per everything and per the policy Clone commando sev (talk) 23:15, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.