Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Titus (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy deleted by User:JamesBWatson under criterion G4. Non-admin closure. "Pepper" @ 10:38, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Michael Titus[edit]
AfDs for this article:
- Michael Titus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unremarkable photographer, who's claims to notability appear to be that he has taught a course at a university, has a failed gallery and is now publishing a coffee table book. Deadly∀ssassin 21:47, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Doesn't seem to have received any significant coverage . . . unclear what's changed since the first AfD. Bongomatic 22:50, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:08, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:09, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy-delete as (i) the re-creation of an article deleted via AfD and (ii) containing very little that's sourced and (iii) obviously promotional. And promptly salt, because (i) mere deletion isn't having a deterrent effect and (ii) successive AfDs are a waste of people's time. Somebody interested in Titus would of course be able to appeal at DRV for encyclopediaworthiness of an entirely different article about him. -- Hoary (talk) 07:26, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.