Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Thomas Ryan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 03:45, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Thomas Ryan[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability and verifiability concerns. Have searched Gbooks, Gweb, Gnews for indications of the subject (with or w/o middle name), no secondary coverage save for a listing credit at tv.com was found. Try as we might, even the BLP Rescue Squad has to admit defeat. Unsourced for 2+ years. j⚛e decker ^talk 15:23, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I can not find any significant coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. Most of the hits that are about him come directly from this article. ~~ GB fan ~~ ^talk 16:09, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (Search video game sources) • Gene93k (talk) 23:40, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:40, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - could not find adequate verification even from industry-heavy mags like Edge magazine. Marasmusine (talk) 12:38, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Lacks coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 14:32, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I tried. No reliable sources can be found. Bearian (talk) 19:17, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.