Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Schlamp

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:50, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Schlamp[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 05:54, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:52, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:52, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:52, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: No level of competition in Australia (national team or otherwise) is considered presumptively notable by NHOCKEY, and there's no evidence this NN player meets the GNG. Ravenswing 18:15, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: seeing some WP:ROUTINE coverage (as he is the captain, he gets a few mentions and post game quips), but nothing significant enough to meet WP:GNG. Certainly fails NHOCKEY with no experience in an established, well-covered league. Yosemiter (talk) 18:58, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.