Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Rutigliano

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 22:08, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note:Rutigliano (disambiguation) has being deleted as there are only two entries left. Hatnotes have being added or fixed accordingly to Sam Rutigliano and the Italian town of Rutigliano. --JForget 22:15, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Rutigliano

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Police sergeant in Ontario that's been charged with various offenses in a corruption investigation. There are sources, but this is a textbook example of WP:BLP1E: no evidence of coverage other than what's directly related to this case, and police sergeants aren't inherently notable. Nyttend backup (talk) 15:46, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

By the way — don't expect me to respond to any questions that you ask me; right now is likely to be the only time I'll be online for several days. Nyttend backup (talk) 15:47, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Rutigliano has no significance outside of the context of this case, and as such clearly violates WP:BLP1E. Jujutacular ^talk_contribs 16:05, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:07, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. -- Cybercobra (talk) 01:36, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOT#NEWS and WP:BLP1E. This one hasn't even gone to trial. Location (talk) 03:25, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Question. Does WP:BLP1E actually apply in this case? He has been charged in several unrelated cases. Unschool 03:57, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- It appears that the various charges have come out of the same "ever-widening investigation".[1]Location (talk) 05:05, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Definately has BLP issues, but also fails WP:N/CA if we're going to look at it that way. Newsworthy, but not notable. Niteshift36 (talk) 05:42, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.