Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Robert Phillips

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 07:55, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Robert Phillips

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is just barely enough information in the article to suggest that he may have some small claim of notability, so I'm listing here for community input. TomStar81 (Talk) 06:39, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:47, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:47, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Run-of-the-mill record producer. Nowhere close to satisfying general notability guidelines, musical notability guidelines, or entertainment notability guidelines. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:26, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the gentleman fails WP:GNG and needs to go. Fiddle Faddle 14:41, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No effective referencing. scope_creep^Talk 18:47, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to show they pass WP:GNG.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:47, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.