Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Rasmussen (professor)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 02:20, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Rasmussen (professor)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet any of the criteria of WP:ACADEMIC. Randykitty (talk) 22:36, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

He meets #6 (high level academic institution) and #7 (impact in his field outside of the academy) of WP:ACADEMIC. - [User:Cshafferdallas] — Cshafferdallas (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Could you please explain exactly how criteria 6 and 7 are met? I don't see any evidence of that at all (as indicated in the nom). Thanks. --Randykitty (talk) 10:12, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:25, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:25, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Nothing I can find on GS. What else is there? Far too early. Xxanthippe (talk) 06:39, 6 April 2013 (UTC).[reply]
Delete. There's nothing I can find that suggests the subject passes WP:PROF, and we wouldn't expect an Assistant Professor to do so. St Anselm (talk) 10:15, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I can't find anything either -- no publications. DGG ( talk ) 19:20, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no notable publications. SalHamton (talk) 06:01, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(With some regret) delete. I gain the impression tha the is a lecturer in a small theological seminary. Having only just gained a Ph.D., it is probably rather early for major publicaitons. Still NN. Peterkingiron (talk) 13:07, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I did not have as a good a grasp at what met the criteria that I thought I did. Cshafferdallas — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cshafferdallas (talk • contribs) 19:39, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:OUTCOMES - short of some extraordinarily well-cited publication or best-selling book, we have tended to delete non-tenured college teachers' articles. Cf. Barbette Spaeth (an associcate professor), or me, for that matter. Bearian (talk) 18:57, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.